Hello my name is Peter, I am a student at Cleveland Early College High School as a freshman and I live in Shelby, North Carolina. I am Vietnamese-American so when I was growing up my parents showed me a lot of Vietnamese films, I don’t think that this affected me much filmwise but I do see the differences in those movies and movies here in America. I would say my family has had a large effect on me movie-wise, because back when I was around nine or ten we would always go to the redbox in Walmart on Fridays and watch a movie. I don’t remember the first movie I ever watched but I know I have been watching movies since I was very young. My earliest recollection of a movie was a Mr. Bean movie. My favorite movies genres include action, comedy, and mystery.
My favorite movies genres include action, comedy, and mystery/thriller. My favorite movies fall in these categories such as “Get Smart” , The John Wick series, and The Anchorman Series. My favorite actors are usually the comedic ones such as Steve Carell, Will Ferrell, and Rowan Atkinson. I don’t know a lot of directors but one that I do know is Edgar Wright, and I love the movies he directs like “Hot Fuzz” and “Shaun of the Dead”.
There are some genres I don’t like as well, such as romance and horror. I especially don’t like horror, I hate being scared and if I watch a horror movie (or even video) it gets stuck in my head for multiple days. The first horror I can recall watching was with my brother and cousins during a sleepover and it was 11/11/11(the Keith Allen film). I was seven at the time and that movie kept me up the rest of the night, I also was scared too to go to the bathroom when it was dark.
Now that time has passed I don’t watch that many movies anymore, at least not with my family, with the advancements of technology and streaming sites like Youtube, I don’t watch as many movies with my family, or any at all. I only watch movies now when I am bored, but there is the occasional get together with everyone in my family, including cousins, and usually we watch a movie. Movies have had a large effect on me when I was younger and helped me make many memories with my family like when we got scared or laughed together. Hopefully in this film class I can learn the elements of a movie that make the memories and notice them when I watch movies.
How can using the elements of film criticism we explored together help you (and others) examine other arts (music, TV, video games, literature, etc.)
Movies and films are a form of art so in turn means that some of the same tactics, philosophies, and lessons needed to watch, examine, and examine movies critically can be used to look at and review other types of art, possibly just in various different ways since not all types of art have the same aspects. Arts can include paintings, shows, books, music, dance, and theater.
Baggage is an example of a concept we learned in this course that can be applied to other things. Bias and baggage can affect your view on anything you have baggage or bias on, this includes shows, music, books,etc. So in turn that means that if we set aside our baggage on films to fairly review or enjoy then we can do the same with other arts like shows, paintings,etc.
Another subject we learned that can be applied to reviewing other arts could be sound design, sound is usually everywhere in art, such as music and the theater. Sound can be used for multiple things, even show feeling and foreshadowing. An example would be a solo in a song or a suspenseful drumming in the background for tension. Even when there isn’t sound like in a silent play/movie you can imagine the sound and the feelings that are supposed to be there,for example a picture of a busy kitchen, you can hear the clattering and buzz in your head.
This same concept can be with color, even if there are no visuals you can imagine a cornfield in the night if it was described. You can see the colors in a painting or in a play so the same ideas apply. Colors have always represented things and they are usually there for a reason.So since they are so important in the setting and tone of movies the same can be said for other things as well. Black in paintings symbolize death or evil and that can go for any other thing as well, blue can symbolize tranquility in both, green can represent nature, and the list goes on.
There are many more subjects that can be connected to other arts but those are the ones I could think of instantly. The things we learned in this course can help you better evaluate, describe, and (hopefully) enjoy all types of arts whether it be a painting, a movie, or a song you heard on the radio.
What was the single best scene in the film?For me the best scene would have to be the scene with Frozone when he is looking for his superhero suit and his wife starts to scold him. This scene happened when the end action was starting to pick up so it was a good unexpected humor scene.
Who gave the best performance?I honestly think that the entire voice actors did great and that they all contributed equally so I would say that all of the main cast/voice actors, aside from the regular henchmen voices, gave the best performance.
Was this the most perfect film you have seen in your life?This was not the most perfect film I have ever seen but it is a great one. Maybe if you asked the six or seven year old me that watched it back then it would hit top three but now I think it is in the top ten. The reason for this is because the film was released in 2004 so movies now have better animation and better looking scenes (I’m not saying the incredibles had bad animation, it’s just that animation now has gotten a lot better).
Was it the absolutely worst film you have ever seen? I don’t know what movie I would consider the absolutely worst but a movie that comes to my mind when I think of bad has to be The Last Airbender, because of the CGI and bad acting
What is your “gut feeling” grade? It may change in the next eight minutes.My gut feeling grade for this movie would have to be a quite high A, the animation is consistent and pretty amazing, and the story is good but the thing that doesn’t give it the one hundred/perfect A is that the story and setting is a little wonky and both fast and slow at times, for example the setting changed from a remote island jungle to a city in a matter of a few minutes, and how Syndrome ended up not being incontrol of his robot so it was just technically the robot as the villain in the end.
Is this the best or worst film you have seen by this director? The only movies I have watched that was by Brad Bird are: The Incredibles, Incredibles 2, Ratatouille, and Mission: Impossible-Ghost Protocol. These movies are all great and were all successful and more on the positive side of the critical reviews. So making it hard to choose the best or worst one, but if I had to choose the worst one it would be The Mission: Impossible one because I don’t remember it as well as the others and the series was already beginning to feel drawn out.
Where on the scale would you put it (from best to worst)? I would put The Incredibles on the top of his movie list because of how much of a classic it is and also because of how I basically was grown on movies like it and that can affect me.
How is this film similar to the director’s other films?This movie, like most of his other films and works, was animated and it was also well received like most of his other works, the story also had more adult themes like some of his other movies like Ratatouille and even Incredibles 2.
How is it different? It is different because it is one of his more younger work and it was the first of his to mix superheroes and families.
How many interesting characters did the writer create? The movie had a handful of interesting characters and I think only a handful, the movie focused more on the family so of course the family would be interesting but every other character was a more static and flat character.
Did the dialogue feel real (authentic and organic), or did it feel forced (fake) or hollow?As I said before the voice acting was great and very real and believable like the teen in Violet and the middle age crisis in Mr.Incredible.
Could you predict events or plot twists before the writer revealed them?Some of the events were predictable such as the villian but the story was fresh in many aspects like the road that led to all the conflict so it wasn’t all too predictable.
Did the character conflicts /crisis situations seem real or artificial (or forced)?What emotions did you feel when watching the film? I do not think the conflict seemed artificial, the voices in all the main characters sounded exactly like their roles, even the unsteady and close to failing marriage between Mr and Mrs Incredible
Examine the acting.
Did the stars of the film act exactly as they do in all other films you’ve seen them in?Looking at the cast for the The Incredibles I don’t recognize anybody but Samuel L. Jackson and he definitely didn’t act like he does in his other movies since this movie was targeted at the younger kid audiences. But this role is different from his other films that are considerably vulgar.
Were you drawn to the characters? Or just the stars? Did it matter?I was drawn to the characters but they weren’t the star characters, I was more drawn to Frozone and Edna more than anyone else in the movie. Focusing on the characters was important to the story because of how it showed the development of a family but I was just drawn in more with some of the side characters.
Did the characters seem real within the story, within the “created world” you witnessed? The characters and voices did seem real within the story and with the pain and emotions in the story and world, like the anger in Syndromes voice that was directed towards Mr. Incredible.
Were you absorbed into the film or more absorbed into your popcorn?I was definitely more absorbed into the movie rather than my snacks because the plot was definitely there and interesting.
Was there a message? There were multiple messages in this movie and two I can instantly think of is that you can count on your family and that you should be truthful and try not to hide your desires, these can be seen when the family shows incredible teamwork and is able to take down the robot and villain. Also when we see Mr. Incredible kept the truth from his family and caused conflict and tension between everyone.
Was there a sense of truth you could feel about the lives of characters on the screen?There was a sense of truth in the family, especially seen in the kids and their interactions and moods. There is the sibling rivalry and the teen and child stereotypes(the not wanting to be seen and the hyperactivity of kids) that are still common in today’s times.
Was there any part of the film that you would enjoy talking about with a friend? There are many parts that I would talk to a friend about like the fight scene the Super Suit scene, or the island infiltration part of the movie.
Did the film have any rhythm or pace to it? The film did have a pace in the beginning telling the backstory and the context of the film but the end of the movie was more rushed with the villains and the fighting as well as the setting change. I would say that it was only a little bit jumbled near the end but the pacing before was steady and believable.
Technical Aspects Looking back at the movie a technical aspect that was lacking for me were some of the character designs and models, some of the characters looked very poorly animated and it showed in their screen time. Something that shined was the colors and scenery when there was action, like the jungle scene were the colors and the night mix well together and it looks real (animation movie wise).
Minute Nine and Minute Ten
Verdict; offer a summary of the film’s story in a few short sentences; share your analysis. Give your report card grade. Overall, I think that this movie is a 2000s classic and it does a great job following a family and the impacts a ban on superheroes had on that superhero family and how they cope and change to that ban and eventually become better together. My grade for this movie is still the same as I said before, it deserves a high A in my eyes.
Paul Greengrass was born in Cheam, Sutton, England on August 13, 1955. When he got older he started working as a journalist for a U.K documentary on the then-current events, he also got to be a producer on that program/show so that’s where he got his first taste of directing and the making of movies/film and started getting more interested in them.
Earlier Independent Movies
He had always loved movies and making them since a young age so he pursued the talent and made multiple dramatized documentaries and book adaptations such as The Fix, The Murder of Stephen Lawrence, Open Fire,etc. He later moved on to making two independent feature films(though he has still never lost his dramatized history aspect in many of his movies both independent and mainstream), The Theory of Flight and Bloody Sunday. Both of these movies were well received and popular in the U.K, even getting multiple awards and honors but they didn’t really gain popularity, traction, or money in the United States.
His Transition To Mainstream and Big Budgets
After Bloody Sunday Greengrass got to direct his first big budget movie, it was The Bourne Supremacy, the sequel to The Bourne Identity, with the budget of 75 million(compared to Bloody Sunday’s 5 million). This movie really shot Greengrass into the Hollywood director fame and marked his transition and start into the more mainstream and bigger budget movies. Since them he has created more movies, some include: Jason Bourne, Captain Phillips, Green Zone, The Bourne Ultimatum, and United 93.
Greengrass’s first big budget was The Bourne Supremacy and it’s budget was 75 million, and by the end of 2004 it gained 176 million in the United States and around 289 million worldwide. While I couldn’t find much about the numbers and money of his independent movies I know that they definitely did not compete with his bigger movies.
I personally have seen a lot of the bigger budget movies he has directed and I liked them a lot because of the way his movies usually are, with the handheld camera and the pace of many of his movies, and I cannot wait for him to direct more.
Superpowers and a murderous killing anti hero with some seriously twisted humor. What’s not to like in this definitely not kid friendly movie mix. Deadpool (2016),starring Ryan Reynolds, is the first Deadpool stand alone movie and definitely will lead to even more movies starring him or including him.
Genre and Rating
Deadpool is a superhero movie that also has comedy, action, some satire, science fiction, and a little bit of romance. Even though that sounds like a great family movie to watch with the kids, it isn’t. Deadpool is rated R and anyone who watched it will definitely agree with that rating, there are tons of curse words and large amounts of gore. So the audience range would definitely aimed more towards older audiences.
Our story starts on bridge with an awesome and gory fight scene, including our main character Deadpool, after the fight scene we get a flashback that goes back about a year that explains all the events that led up to that point. We learn that Deadpool is a past special forces soldier named Wade Wilson(Ryan Reynolds) working as a mercenary, he meets the love of his life Vanessa(Morena Baccarin). After learning that he has terminal cancer he leaves Vanessa (so she won’t have to see him die) and is approached by a mysterious man that says there is a new experimental treatment that could potentially save him.
Wade does agree to be in the experiment and is injected with a serum and is tortured for multiple days by people of the name of Ajax(Ed Skrein) and Angel Dust(Gina Carano). Both these things were for him to awaken his mutant powers inside him by awakening and agitating his mutant genes. This method works and gives him the ability of superhuman healing which is able to kill the cancer as fast as it grows , this does come with a price though. After the torture and experiments Wade’s skin is completely ruined with burn marks, even to the point where he looks like “…an avocado had sex with an older, more disgusting avocado”. So we come back to the bridge scene where we learn Wade had become Deadpool and has been tracking down Ajax to find a cure or solution to his face. So for the rest of the movie we are asking the question how will he fix his face and save the girl but also how he will use his power, for good or for his own gain?
Focus and Theme
At first glance this movie looks like just an action flick that would on intense fights and dark twisted humor but if you look closer there are many signs of character focus and morality and ethics. As well as themes such as how we sometimes use humor to hide pain or frustration, or even how far some people will go for love or even looks.
Personal Thoughts and Evaluation
I honestly enjoyed this movie and I didn’t really know much about Deadpool before except that he was a comic book character that liked to kill and make jokes but this movie as an origin story really worked because it kept that aspect of him while still explains his origin and situation very well. I also think that the acting in this movie was really well, Ryan Reynolds plays the goofy and vulgar Wade Wilson like that is actually him. Also I think that the story is good as well, I feel that it is cliche though, like the superhero gets powers and has to save the girl but the way the directors and screenwriters break the fourth wall I feel like this is intended. The characters are great, and the supporting characters do add the extra comedic effect since this movie is a big comedy with the superhero and action mixed in.
If I were to give this movie a grade I would give it a mid A because I think that everything from the comedy of improvised lines to the special effects blood and gore were great, the only negative I had was with the cussing. Even though I knew this movie would have a lot of it since it was rated R, I think cursing can enhance or effect the line but the movie went a little overboard with the language to the point where it was just filler words to me that didn’t affect anything but the MPAA rating.
So to wrap things up I would definitely suggest this movie if you are not with kids and just looking for a movie to be entertained with action and comedy and even see some hidden lessons.
For this post I am focusing on who I think is one of the best comic actors, Steve Carell
Steve Carell is a pretty well known actor in the comedy world and he has a comedic range he can act in. He made his first appearance acting in the movie Carly Sue, he continued to act in some small roles but his big break happened when he starred in the movie The 40-Year-Old Virgin and show The Office. Afterwards he starred in other films such as Evan Almighty, Get Smart, Dinner fo Schmucks, etc.
Steve Carell is funny because he knows how to use his facial expressions and silence advance his dry and awkward humor. I don’t know how to exactly name his humor but it has childlike roots(toilet humor/dirty) and just humor that is so stupid that it is funny. Apparently a lot of people agree with me too since he has gotten multiple awards for the roles he played in the sitcom The Office and also awards for The 40-Year-Old Virgin.
He has even acted in more serious roles such as in Foxcatcher which is a drama/thriller film. This is why I chose Steve Carrell because I think he has amazing range in his acting even if it is not a comedic role.
In this post I will be talking about Leonardo DiCaprio, who I think is an amazing actor. He has acted in many different movies(list here of movies he has starred or co-starred in) and has gotten many awards and award nominations.
Like I said he has acted in multiple movies, he is best known for his roles in Titanic, Inception, The Departed, and many more. The movies are said to be good because of the characters and the plot, I remember watching Inception and I would agree the movie would not be the same if it weren’t for the characters including Mr.DiCaprio who plays as a smart but troubled man/thief. An example in that movie of good acting was when you saw his character being tempted by his wife to stay in the world of dreams together forever. You see that he acts like a normal natured human would, he is torn and can barely choose, you can just see the emotions in the way he talks and looks in that tense scene.
Another example is when he co-stars in the movie Catch Me If You Can play as Frank Abagnale. In this role he had to even play as someone who acted so in a way he was playing an actor. This role had many unnatural acting parts so he played off many roles, as a pilot, an FBI agent, and a cunning sly thief. This just shows the range Leonardo DiCaprio has for acting, to fighting his demons internally to acting as a runaway genius fugitive. He even has multiple scenes in movies where he shows himself and doesn’t even seem like he’s acting such as when in the movie Catch Me If You Can, when he is told his dad died he totally looks like he is in denial and anger, I think he did tap into something to play that part.
Leonardo has also won many awards and gotten many nominations(the full list is here). In all he has 98 wins and 210 nominations, to name a few wins he has gotten: an Oscar for best Actor in a leading role, a few Golden Globe Awards for best performance, a BAFTA award for best leading actor, an AACTA International Award for best lead actor, and there are many, many more.
I think he is a talent worth honoring because if you watch the movies he is in he plays his character so real that you can imagine him being that person in real life. He plays off his emotions so well, when he wants to seem torn he looks torn, when you see him dying of laughter you believe he actually thinks it is funny. An example of him playing something off so well(reactionary acting) was in the movie Django Unchained when he actually slammed his hand on some glass, he didn’t hesitate and just kept on with his lines he knew it would advance the scene and later on keeping bandages on his hand for continuation. That is why I chose him for this post and assignment, he makes good movies even better.
In a Quiet Place we are following the Abbott family in a post-apocalyptic world where these monster like aliens hunt and kill whatever makes sound. These monsters have amazing hearing so we are taken for the ride along with the Abbott family when we see their everyday life and challenges without making a lot of sound. We are dropped in around 89 days after the monsters have attacked leaving everything looking abandoned, we are introduced to the monster after the little kid Beau Abbott is killed by a monster after making noise. The story then skips to 472 days after the monsters took over, we see that Reagan and Evelyn both blame themselves(Evelyn because she didn’t carry him that day and Reagan because she let Beau have the toy that made sound). Evelyn is in the final stages of pregnancy so the whole family is preparing noise proof areas, but one day when she goes into labor early and makes noise everyone else is gone so she sets up the warning system and tries to give birth while the monster hunts her. The other family members see the warning and come to help. It ends up that Lee is killed sacrificing his life for both Reagan and Marcus because they were in a tight spot close to the monster. But towards the end the family finds that the hearing aid Lee gave to Reagan exposes the monsters enough to kill them, so the final shot is them getting ready to take on the other two monsters in the area.
There are four main characters, they are all part of the Abbott Family. They are Lee Abbott(played by John Krasinski), Evelyn Abbott(played by Emily Blunt), Reagan Abbott(played by Millicent Simmonds), and Marcus Abbott(plated by Noah Jupe). Lee is the father and Evelyn is the mother, while both Marcus and Reagan are the children. Side note: both the character and actor of Reagan are deaf.
Genre and Audience
A Quiet Place has many genres that include horror(due to the fear factor of the film), thriller(due to the suspense of the film), science fiction(because of the alien like monsters), and I would even say that is has a family genre as well since the movie is focused on the Abbott family and there troubles and relationships. I think this movie would be a little graphic for younger kids, but I think the young adult and adult age groups would be the perfect viewing group.
Reagan vs Self-Reagan blames herself for the death of Beau and she lets it affect her mood and attitude
Evelyn vs Self- Evelyn blames herself for Beau’s death because she didn’t carry him that day when he made the huge noise
Lee vs Reagan- Reagan blames herself for Beau’s death and she also thinks that Lee blames her so you can see the moments when they don’t necessarily get along and get frustrated with each other
Family vs Supernatural/Unknown- the entire family is against the monsters which they only know the bare minimum about
Family vs Nature- the family has to go against sound and sound is part of nature and living
Marcus vs Self- throughout the film you see Marcus having difficulty doing dangerous task but we see him evolve and willing to do dangerous task for the safety of his family
Evelyn vs Nature- Evelyn is pregnant most of the movie and it does cause many setbacks and problems for the family(pregnancy is considered human nature)
The message I got from the film is that family is important no matter what, this is shown even when Beau dies the family stays together and continues to survive. Another theme would be you should be willing to do things for your family, for instance we see Marcus willing to do a dangerous task after being told it is for his mom. We also see Lee sacrifice himself to save his children.
There were many spots where the camera impacted and enhanced the story such as when they used the camera multiple times to focus on newspapers and writings to tell us that these monsters have acute hearing such as in Abbott house and on Lee’s white board that had multiple notes on the monster. This movie did not get any awards for cinematography but I think it should’ve gotten more nominations for it because the camera angles and geography scenes looked amazing to me.
The Quiet Place did win an award for sound, it was the Satellite Award for Best Sound. I can see why, sound is very important in this film and the world our characters so I can tell that sound was worked on heavily. Such as when the director wanted there to only be natural sound or when they wanted to emphasize natural sound. Such as when we hear the first loud sound when Beau turns on the loud rocket ship toy and gets killed, up until that point it was quiet so that loud sound gets you attention and keeps it.
To me, the movie succeeded because it kept me on the edge of my seat, it was to the point where I would try not to make any noise like the characters. The sound aspect really worked for me, especially with headphones because it immerses you into that world, which is pretty cool in any film. If I would give this movie a grade I would give it a solid A, maybe somewhere between a 90 and a 97, because I think some of the logic is weird(like why Lee didn’t notice Reagan’s conflict and why they would decide a baby would be a good decision in that world).
From a town known as Wheeling, West Virginia Rode a boy with a six gun in his hand And his daring life of crime made him a legend in his time east and west of the Rio Grande.
Well he started with a bank in Colorado in the pocket of his vest, a Colt he hid and his age and his size took the teller by surprise and, the word spread of Billy the kidWell he never travelled heavy yes he always rode alone and he soon put many older guns to shame and he never had a sweetheart and he never had a home but the cowboy and the rancher knew his name
Well he robbed his way from Utah to Oklahoma and the largest could not seem to track him down and it served his legend well For the folks they loved to tell about When Billy the kid came to town
Well one cold day a posse captured Billy and the judge said “String him up for what he did” And the cowboys and their kin like the sea, came pouring in to watch the hanging of Billy the kid.
Well he never travelled heavy yes he always rode alone and he soon put many older guns to shame and he never had a sweetheart but he finally found a home under the boothill grave that bears his name.
From a town known as Oyster Bay Long Island Rode a boy with a six pack in his hand and his daring life of crime made him a legend in his time east and west of the Rio Grande
The main character is Billy the Kid and he isn’t necessarily the “good guy” because he is a criminal, the lyrics do make us sympathize with him though saying things like how he was alone and didn’t have a sweetheart or home until he died. There are other people like the posse, the cowboy, and the rancher. They aren’t big characters however, the conflict isn’t very clear in the song but I would say that the conflict could be man vs society(since he is a criminal) and man vs self because of how alone he is as a criminal. The end is bittersweet I would say, because the writer states that Billy found a home but it is in a grave after he is hanged.
In the song it is said that Billy the Kid was from Wheeling, West Virginia but what kicked off his outlaw life was robbing a “bank in Colorado”. After that he kept on moving from Utah to Oklahoma based on the real Billy the Kid I would say it took place in 1860s through 1880s
If this was made into a film I think that the genre would be drama and action, I think this because the action aspect would be him running from the law and robbing banks. The drama aspect would be his life and his lack of people that care for him(home and a sweetheart).
Hugo Cabret is an orphaned, poor, and and all alone boy, his father died when he was young and left him and automaton to repair. After his father’s death he goes to live with his uncle who is a drunk and teaches him to work and maintain the clocks of a train station in 1930s Paris. Once his uncle goes missing for months he does what he can to survive by stealing food and even machine parts to repair the automaton. Stealing does get him caught and he even loses his dad’s notebook(inciting incident) to a shopkeeper Georges Méliès, the notebook had important information including how to fix the automaton. Trying to get the notebook back he meets Isabelle, goddaughter of Georges. They form a relationship, as they grow closer they are able to fix and operate the automaton(with the help of a necklace Isabelle has), when this happens a new mystery is formed. The automaton drew a picture of a famous film and signed the name Georges Méliès, after research in a library they find that Papa Georges is actually a well known filmmaker that had lost many of his movies and had become bitter and aggravated of the movie life. Throughout the end of the film the children try to influence and persuade Georges that he is still important and that his films were inspirational. At the end of the film they do make him see that his work is appreciated. And as Hugo is about to be taken away to an orphanage Georges ends up taking Hugo in as his own. So throughout the movie he went through many quests like repairing an automaton, meet new people, find a family, and have peace with his dad’s death.
In this movie there are two big story questions, will Hugo be able to fix the automaton that he and his dad started to fix and can they get Papa Georges to realize he still has a purpose?
In this movie I feel like there are many genres such as family, adventure, mystery, and a little fantasy. The movie focuses on things like family values and truth as well as a quest the main character goes through.
Entertainment or Lesson
I think that this film was to both entertain and to teach a few lessons. The camera work and setting was beautiful and amazing but there’s also some important lessons, one was everyone has a purpose, another would be opening up to the right people can get them to open up to you. The movie even showed some of the process in making the movies at that early time and how it affected and inspired many people.
Is the Film Worthy of Awards
The film got many awards such as Best Achievement in Cinematography,Best Achievement in Sound Mixing,Best Achievement in Sound Editing,Best Achievement in Visual Effects,Best Achievement in Art Direction. They also got many more nominees and awards(link here). In my opinion the story of the film was quite slow to me and I feel that some things were left out(like some of Hugo’s father aspects) but its camera work and sound work do deserve the attention it got because watching the movie looked so nice and so did the sounds and music.
The story did have a similar structure in the beginning but I feel like the movie had two climaxes such as when the automaton starts working but then again when the kids have to convince George’s that he is appreciated. I’m not sure how to feel about that but it did feel like two different adventures because after one was done it opened up another.
My interpretation of the movie makes it a distant Buddy Love story genre, the movie is quite focused on the change in Hugo. Hugo is the incomplete hero that has no family or even close ones at the start of the film. The Counterpart could be many things such as Isabelle or even Georges which represents family and close ones. The complication could be his situation such as being and orphan, another thing would be him being misunderstood such as when in the beginning of the movie both Georges and Isabelle call him nothing but a thief.
Impact of Characters
There were many characters in this film many were side characters such as commoners to the train station that helped reinforce the lesson of opening up so that others would to. But the main characters were also very important such as Isabelle, she reinforces the lesson that everyone has a part(Georges also reinforces this) and is an important person to Hugo as his friend and as someone who helped him. Georges also impacted the story because he was the mystery and drive of the second half of the movie.
What best represents Hugo would be the romantic hero, he is rejected because he is an orphan and steals from time to time. He is also on a quest the entire movie, to fix the automaton, show Georges his films are appreciated, and even though he doesn’t know it, find a family. He does show compassion and care for other people as we see in the movie.
The main character arc was within Hugo for most of the story but some was also in Georges, in the beginning Hugo keeps to himself and doesn’t open up to either Georges or Isabelle, but later on he learns to trust Isabelle as their relationship grows especially about his dad. The character arc in Georges was him at first being distant and closed about his path but he also opens up later on about it.
Characters, Dynamic or Static?
Main characters like Hugo and Georges changed(as stated above) but some like Isabelle did not.
Authors Intent and Focus
I think that the author was focused on the characters because of the characters presented and the change they went through, I think that characters and ideas are the most important aspects in any film. It is usually the characters and ideas the audience either relate to or think about after the film.
The most important character conflicts in this film were character vs. character, character vs self, and character vs. unknown. Hugo had to go through many people such as the station inspector that wanted to put him in an orphanage; he also had conflicts within himself such as the confusion of his dad’s death since he was still just a child. He also had to go through the unknown because he was an orphan and had to steal for food, so there was always the chance of him getting caught and sent to a dark unknown future at an orphanage.
Personal Response and Recommendation
The weakest point for me was how long it took for the movie to get to the main story points, it took around 50 minutes (out of two hours) for the first act to finish. The strong points were the setting, camera shots, and music. I think that the story did struggle because of the two different quest, the repairing the automaton and then helping Georges. I think it did lead to a more rushed story. But the story did take me on both adventures because they did do the characters well in my opinion and there was a good mystery in both adventures. My opinion and reaction to this movie is that it is boring and slow at many parts but there is an interesting story and elements of mystery. I think the appropriate audience for this film is children and families since that is what is focused on in most parts. I would give this film a B while it has some slow points it also has good shots and music.
On this entry I am interviewing my dad, he is 54(at the time of this entry). I will be asking questions and summarizing and translating his words since he doesn’t speak english fluently.
Interviewed: Dat Tuong (English name is Michael) Race: Asian(Vietnamese) Age: 54 Town of Residency: Shelby, NC
What were some of the first films you remember watching in a theatre?
I watched many films when I was young in Vietnam but not any American films, they were more Russian and German films that were translated for us. I remember the first American movie I ever watched and it was Deep Impact.
What do you remember about those early film experiences (food, type of theatre, friends, family, how you felt when watching a film in a theatre, etc.)?
I remember some things like the food they were selling(peanuts and small candies), I also remember going with just some of my friends.
Did you watch many films growing up in theatres (or at home)? If so, what films were you drawn to?
When I was younger I went to the small theater many times, I really liked movies the have the 007 vibe, the action and spy theme.
Did you ever go to Drive-In Movies when you were younger? What do you remember about those?
I don’t remember having a drive in theater close to where I lived. But when I came to America and had children I did go for a few years but it has been a few years since I last went to one. (He is talking about the Sunset Drive-In in Shelby)
Do you remember when the event films like “Jaws” and “Star Wars” when they were in theatres?
I do not remember them that much because again I lived in Vietnam, which didn’t very play, much advertise American movies, even big ones
When HBO, Showtime, VCRs or DVDs were readily available, did that change how you went to see movies? Or which ones you went to see in a theatre?
I don’t think it changed what type of movies I watched but it did change how I went to watch them, DVDs meant I could rewatch movies even after the first time so the DVDs were better money spent.
Did you ever go rent movies from a video store? If so, how did you decide what to choose to watch with all those choices?
I never went to a video store like the old Blockbuster but there was is Redbox in Walmart that I went to back around five years ago, I haven’t gone there in a while and I’m not sure its still there. If I saw a cover that I liked I took it home and watched it.
How and where do you watch most of your movies now (theatres, DVDs, streaming, etc)?
Now because of things like Netflix and Youtube I watch most things at home like my shows and movies.
What kinds of films do you watch now? Do you feel those tastes have changed much in the past 20 years?
I usually like to watch horror, action, and comedy movies, I have always liked them, I still like to watch those movies types so I don’t think my favorites have changed.
How often do you go to theatres now to see films? How different is it now than when you first you experienced films films in theaters (sizes of theaters, food choices, movie choice options, etc)? What do you attribute the changes to (if there is one)?
I don’t go to the movies in theaters very often any more, mainly because I am very busy. From the last time I went I could say that there have been some changes such as how it is more technological and advance. I also have seen increase in games and food.
What’s the last film you watched in a movie theatre? Did you enjoy the experience?
It has been a while since the last time, all I remember is that it was a new Star Wars movie (He is referring to Star Wars VII). I didn’t hate the experience but it wasn’t amazing so I would say it was so-so.